Following on from my recent posts about trading volatility
over weekends, I’m now going to briefly look at trading options overnight.
Option traders have always complained when they were too
long options overnight, expecting to usually lose money on overnight longs.
This doesn’t make sense in a pure Black-Scholes-Merton world. In that world the
time decay (theta) will be balanced by the expected change in the underlying
(gamma). But we have already seen that this doesn’t hold over weekends. So while option traders might be the whiniest
group of trading professionals and are more than willing to complain about
anything (I’ve heard such classics as, “I hate summer” and “Christmas is
literally the worst thing ever”), it is worth examining whether they were right
about this particular thing.
Dmitriy Muravyev and Xuechuan Nia wrote a paper that studies
this. While it is very well
known that returns to index options are negative (about -0.7% a day in terms of
actual premium decay for the S&P) it turns out that all of this comes from
overnight decay. Specifically, delta-hedged option returns are -1% overnight,
while intraday returns are positive at 0.3% per day.
On its own this won’t actually lead to a good trading
strategy. If we to buy options every day and short them overnight the trading
costs would be prohibitive. But it tells us where the variance premium comes
from. We get paid for taking the risk of illiquidity, for having a bet that we
can’t get out of if it goes against us.
Or else people are afraid of the dark.
What is the rationale for this though? Is it just the imbalance between theta and gamma?
ReplyDeleteI would presume that since you have positions 'locked' till markets open, you are exposing yourself to events overnight that could affect prices between open and t-1 close. Hence for taking that risk, there must be an associated value addition somewhere.
You are absolutely exposed to risk. But you get paid more than you should for taking it.
ReplyDeleteYou are also paid for taking "fear" when you sleep.
ReplyDelete